9/11: Ten Years Later

I understand that there are people out there who believe that it’s
irreverent and disrespectful to refer to what happened to the World Trade Centre with an abbreviation, but the news has deemed it an acceptable term, so I have no qualms in doing so.

To further preface this post, I am a Canadian. More than that, I spent roughly half my life in Asia, so I don’t have the deep emotional connections to the event that many of you probably do. I watched the replays of the towers fall while in the Philippines, an ocean away.

I was deeply saddened and shocked by what occurred, but didn’t think much about it again until about two years ago, when I heard about what was being done with the remains of the towers. Right now there is a battleship named The USS New York, a Navy assault ship built with steel from the World Trade Centre. As a symbol it certainly holds a different viewpoint when it comes to beating swords into ploughshares.

Much more recently I stumbled upon the infographic on the right. It goes into detail about the new World Trade Centre, and the awe-inspiring ideas behind it.

The new building will be 1,776 feet, the tallest in the US. While the exact height is representative of the years of the country’s independence, I think it represents more than that. The USS New York is the remnants of a tragedy forged into a weapon. The new World Trade Centre may only be 49 feet taller than the former, but the fact that it stands that much taller communicates America’s fearlessness and audacity; if you knock it down we will rebuild it bigger.

There’s quite a bit of news all over the place about memorial services, and servicemen and servicewomen not being able to attend due to “important” people being there, but that’s for other, more well-researched articles. The point I’m trying to make is that ten years ago catastrophe occurred, and since then a nation has been trying to get back on its feet. The whole world is paying close attention to see how exactly America will choose move forward.

4 responses to “9/11: Ten Years Later

  1. While I am uncomfortable with the USS New York, I don’t think I have a problem with the “if you knock it down we will rebuild it bigger” mentality behind the tower itself. And even with the battleship, my only real reservations come from being a Christian. I imagine that if I weren’t a Christian, I’d think it was great.

    As for the gigantic picture/chart of the tower: wow. That is a lot of…things. There are many things in that chart. Gracious.

  2. Right- I don’t necessarily think there’s a problem with the “we’ll make it again but bigger” mindset. Granted, the word “audacity” is pretty loaded, so yeah, fair point.

    There are a great many things on that chart. If I had commented first [which I forgot to do so this time] I would have pointed out the two thirty-foot man-made waterfalls.

  3. Yeah, audacity is loaded, but I think within the context of the pairing “fearlessness and audacity” the flavor of the word is nudged into the positive realm of its connotations. And the plans are rather staggering indeed.
    As for the USS New York… merf.

  4. The year 2001 should not be repeated

Join the discussion-

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s