This will be a shorter post than usual because I am visiting my family for the week while John and I transition from “school home” to our “summer job home”. In the spirit of moving, I wanted to touch on a question that might occur to anyone who has ever had to pack up their belongings: How much stuff is too much stuff?
This is an example of what too much stuff looks like.
This past Saturday John and I handed back the keys to the basement suite we called home for our last two years of university life. Despite storing our books and dishes at a friend’s house, we still ended up with way more bags and boxes than our small car could possible hold. While I struggled to decide which pants I wore least often and how badly I would need those mason jars for canning, John had no qualms throwing out pretty much anything that he knew he wouldn’t need in the immediate future. He also jokingly called me a hoarder, knowing that it would get under my skin.
As I sat on my suitcase (in an attempt to keep as many of my clothes as possible), I thought back to a couple years earlier when almost all of my earthly possessions could fit into one suitcase. What is it that makes me hold onto things now so much more dearly than I did a few years ago? Continue reading
Posted in advertising, Economy, environmentalism, technology, Travel
Tagged consumer, consumption, fix, grateful, gratefulness, hoarder, hoarding, move, moving, planned obsolescence, purging, repair, replace, sentimental, sustainability, thrift shop, thrift store, university, unnecessary
In my last post, I told you a little bit about Lisa Nakamura, her research, and the talk she gave at my university about Tumblr activism. I also promised to tell you about her second lecture the next time I wrote.
Both of Nakamura’s lectures were about digital media, but unlike her first talk, her second presentation focused on the physical material of digital technology.
Unless you’ve been hiding under a rock, or recently time-travelled to 2015, you probably wouldn’t be surprised to hear that most of your digital hardware came from Asia. You may even be familiar with the way Asian women have been racialized as innately predisposed to factory work because of their “supposed docility, nimble fingers and attention to mind-numbing detail”.
Click on the image to view the full infographic.
However, you might be surprised to learn that this stereotype has been applied to women of colour ever since the digital revolution. In her paper on “Indigenous Circuits: Navajo Women and the Racialization of Early Electronics Manufacture” Nakamura examines the way digital factory work is both gendered and racialized. She refers to the work of Karen Hossfeld when she insists that
“…by the eighties in Silicon Valley, electronic assembly had become, not just women’s work but women of color’s work.” (290)
Posted in feminism, history, internet, morality, race, technology
Tagged American Indian Movement, Asia, Asian women, black boxed, China, Chinese factories, computers, design, digital revolution, docile, economic convenience, electronic assembly, Ethical, exploitative labour, factory work, Fairchild Semiconductor Company, female factory workers, feminism, gender, gender stereotypes, gendered, Indigenous Circuits, iphone, Karen Hossfeld, labor of love, Lisa Nakamura, Navajo, nimble fingers, phone, physical, planned obsolescence, predisposed, Protest, race, racial stereotypes, racialized, rugs, scholars, Silicon Valley, smart phones, stereotype, Tumblr, weaving, work