I don’t know about you, but I can’t stop listening to “Hymn for the Weekend” on repeat.
However, before I had even listened to Chris Martin and Queen Bey meld their voices in a divine mesh of harmonies, I was reading about it on Tumblr.
Cultural Appreciation vs. Appropriation
The first thing I heard about the video was that it had some pretty rampant cultural appropriation. Since there have been a number of music videos and performances accused of cultural appropriation over the last few years, I wasn’t too surprised to hear about “Hymn for the Weekend” being added to the list.
The video quickly split viewers into two groups, those who considered it cultural appropriation, and those who appreciated the video’s focus on Indian culture. The clip below highlights a few of the key elements that have been discussed and criticized.
This discussion is tricky for a variety of reasons. For example, there is a time and place when a white person can wear Indian clothing and accessories without coming off as disrespectful. In some cases, it’s actually much more respectful to embrace local dress customs than to ignore them.
There are even music videos where diverse customs and styles have been featured without any backlash about appropriation.
This debate can also seem confusing when Indian fans, or fans with Indian heritage, don’t seem to be bothered by the video’s representation of their culture.
Posted in feminism, media, music, race, Uncategorized
Tagged American, backlash, Beyoncé, black, black woman, Bollywood, Coldplay, criticized, cultural appreciation, cultural appropriation, Culture, cultures, damsel, dark skinned Indian, discussion, diverse, ecotic, exotic, famous, fans, foreign, heritage, Hymn for the Weekend, Immigrants, India, Indian, Japanese, music video, mysterious, Nikita Redkar, other, people of colour, performance, Princess of China, race, respectful, responsibility, Rihanna, style, Trope, woman of colour, work
Environmental racism was one of the most surprising concepts I encountered during my undergrad. It had just never occurred to me that where and how we polluted our environment would be intentionally arranged to affect some racial communities more than others.
In the States there have been several famous instances of environmental racism.
After the Second World War, for example, Chicago kindly provided African American veterans the opportunity to live in a housing community built atop an abandoned landfill. After serving their country and surviving the war these veterans came home to Altgeld Gardens Homes, a community that would have significantly high cancer rates because of exposure to toxic chemicals.
Then, in the 1970s and 80s, there was the Warren County PBC Landfill case, when the state of North Carolina decided to bury soil that had been contaminated with toxic polychlorinated biphenyls in Warren Country, a community with primarily black residents and a much lower income rate than the rest of the state.
With the very likely possibility of their drinking water being contaminated by the toxic material, residents, civil rights groups, environmental leaders, and clergymen all joined together to protest the state’s decision…
…and then got arrested.
Posted in Canada, environmentalism, race
Tagged Aamjiwnaang First Nations, activists, African-American, Altgeld Gardens Homes, arrested, Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation (ACFN), boil tap water, Canada, cancer, care, chicago, civil rights, clean water, clergy, cloud makers, Compassion for Racial Justice, contaminated, contributing, D.C., deformed fish, drinking water, environmental justice, environmental racism, Environmentalist, facilities, first nations, Fort Chipewyan, George Bush hates black people, health issues, Hurricane Katrina, institutionalized racial segregation, issue, Justin Trudeau, L.A., liberals, low birht rate, oil sands, people of colour, pollution, Protest, racism, scholars, settler-Canadians, tar sands, toxins, Trudeau, United Church, Warren County PBC Landfill, waste facilities, WWII