Just to start with, I honestly don’t think anyone expected to see Scarlett Johansson mercilessly gunning down Asians in two separate movies:
Lucy (2014) – “You speak English?” *BLAM*
Ghost in the Shell (2017) – Well, at least they’re armed this time.
That’s a bit of a tangent, but still relevant as this was sparked by the live-action Ghost in the Shell adaptation, which premiered in theatres across the country today. It’s also worth starting things out with a diversion, if only because I didn’t want you to get into a breakdown of the title a split second after reading it.
FACT: All Asian Americans are Asian by definition, but not all Asians are Asian Americans. The truth is that most Asians aren’t. While they may share an ethnic heritage, as well as many cultural similarities, Asian people who were born and raised in and reside in an Asian country have vastly different wants and needs and priorities than those who were born and raised in and reside in North America [and other non-Asian countries].
For the purposes of clarity I will be referring to the former as “Asians”, and the latter as “Asian Americans”.
With all of that being said, it should be obvious that Asians and Asian Americans also have very different views when it comes to their shared representation in Western media. Continue reading
Posted in America, Asia, bizarreness, film, race, television
Tagged Asia, asian, Asian-American, casting, demographic, Ghost In The Shell, Japan, Japanese, Lucy, opinion, opportunity, perspective, race, representation, Scarlett Johansson, whitewashing
Last week, my news feed blew up with a surprising announcement: the “Post-Seculars” have arrived.
Before I get into what exactly that’s supposed to mean, let’s deal with the source of this news. This new classification of human being comes to us from an article published in the American Sociological Review, and is based on data collected from the General Social Survey (GSS), a biennial survey of American households that, among other things, asks respondents about their attitudes regarding religion and the sciences, as well as general familiarity with facts about the latter.
Now, that’s about as much background as you’ll get from your standard internet source, but fortunately for you I’m a nerd, so I read the actual paper (with skimming. I’m not a robot). Basically, participants in the GSS were asked a lot of questions like: “does science increase opportunities for the next generation,” “should science receive more government funding,” “is the Bible the actual word of God,” etc. Yes, the religion portion is absurdly Judeo-Christian-biased, but they tried to cover more ground with some personal rankings of general religiosity. In addition, the participants were asked to answer some questions to test scientific knowledge, like: “does radioactivity occur naturally?”
Our sociologist friends found that 43% of participants adhered to what they refer to in the article as the “traditional” perspective (religiously focused with little to no understanding of/appreciation for science) and 36% could be labelled as “Moderns” (the opposite of Traditionals). The remaining 21 percent were something in between.
But not “in-between” like Richard Dawkins playing dress-up with Papal robes.
Posted in religion, science, Sociology
Tagged American Sociological Review, demographic, evolution, faith, GSS, Moderns, Post-Secularism, Post-Seculars, religion, science, scientific method, secularism, sociology, Traditionals, world view