And that’s a weird question to ask- especially coming from me.
Yours truly, for any new readers, is a dude. I’ve never worn high heels, and with my long and elegant (if somewhat hairy) legs, I’ve never had cause to.
Like this, only more so.
In spite of my obvious lack of experience, compounded with a whole gamut of cultural-historial-societal variables, I’d still wholeheartedly call myself a feminist. As such, I still feel compelled to ask-
Can a feminist wear high heels?
And I know this isn’t a new issue. For years, folks have generally agreed that high heels are uncomfortable and impractical. There’s not shortage of studies demonstrating the range of health issues they can cause: calf cramps, chronic (and permanent) pain, pelvic issues, callouses and corns, inflammation, pinched nerves, tendinitis, and a host of others which I could spend this entire post just listing.
I’m not going to do that.
According to science and common ****ing sense, no one’s are…
High heels are bad for you. That’s a cold, hard medical fact, and one that most everyone’s familiar with by now. Still, women continue to wear ’em, which again begs the question of “Why in heaven’s name would they put themselves through this?” Continue reading
Posted in advertisement, advertising, bizarreness, business, design, fashion, feminism, history
Tagged 2nd wave, advertising, arguments against, arguments for, cosmo, Cosmopolitan, Culture, damage, feminine, femininity, feminism, Feminist, Foot Binding, footwear, health, heels, high heels, history, issues, Jezebel, make-up, Medical, Men, Necktie, Prada, Stilleto, style, Versace, women
…And for those of you concerned, Evan has mandated a cut-off for these posts. As important as they are, and as many interesting questions as they raise, there’s only so many weeks in a row we can dedicate to beating a dead horse.
I feel first that I should clarify some of my points in my original response. When I was first drafting it, I was concerned that Kat (who had written a rather personal piece) might take it the wrong way- I’m glad that she gave me the benefit of the doubt on it. Truth is, my issue isn’t with Kat (who I think would agree with most of what I’m about to argue) but with the wider implications of Deschanel’s statements (though there were a few points I take issue with in Kat’s response- but we’ll get to that).
Deschanel argued that “we can be powerful in our own way, our own feminine way“. My response was “No, you ****ing can’t”.
Not “no, you *****ing can’t be powerful”, not “no, you can’t be feminine” (whatever “feminine” means), but rather “no, you can’t have your ‘own feminine way.'”
Why? Continue reading
Posted in bizarreness, celebrity, fashion, feminism, history, lgbt, morality, science
Tagged biological, burnout, clothing, corset, Deschanel, evolutionary psychology, femininity, feminism, gender, gender binary, gender roles, girl, girly, helping profession, high heels, man, Manly, masculine, masculinity, Medical, nurse, Parthians, pink, princess of power, sex, sexism, sexist, she-ra, stereotype, tradition, warrior-princess, woman, womanly, Zoey Deschanel