…And for those of you concerned, Evan has mandated a cut-off for these posts. As important as they are, and as many interesting questions as they raise, there’s only so many weeks in a row we can dedicate to beating a dead horse.
I feel first that I should clarify some of my points in my original response. When I was first drafting it, I was concerned that Kat (who had written a rather personal piece) might take it the wrong way- I’m glad that she gave me the benefit of the doubt on it. Truth is, my issue isn’t with Kat (who I think would agree with most of what I’m about to argue) but with the wider implications of Deschanel’s statements (though there were a few points I take issue with in Kat’s response- but we’ll get to that).
Deschanel argued that “we can be powerful in our own way, our own feminine way“. My response was “No, you ****ing can’t”.
Not “no, you *****ing can’t be powerful”, not “no, you can’t be feminine” (whatever “feminine” means), but rather “no, you can’t have your ‘own feminine way.'”
Why? Continue reading
Posted in bizarreness, celebrity, fashion, feminism, history, lgbt, morality, science
Tagged biological, burnout, clothing, corset, Deschanel, evolutionary psychology, femininity, feminism, gender, gender binary, gender roles, girl, girly, helping profession, high heels, man, Manly, masculine, masculinity, Medical, nurse, Parthians, pink, princess of power, sex, sexism, sexist, she-ra, stereotype, tradition, warrior-princess, woman, womanly, Zoey Deschanel
It’s 2015, readers, and what better way to start off the year that’s just beginning than by railing on an idea that need to end? Yup, we’re talking Postmodernism here.
Not too long ago, I wrote an article giving an overview of Postmodernism, and it nearly killed me. Yours truly tries to make a point of not including my own judgments in these posts and just let folks draw their own conclusions, but this one- gah. Took every ounce of my (limited) restraint not to rip it to pieces and cackle victoriously as I squat over the grave of Jacques Derrida and…
…well I’m getting ahead of myself, aren’t I?
What’s Postmodernism? Continue reading
Posted in art, bizarreness, communication, design, internet, language, literature, media, morality, science
Tagged 1st world, 1st world problems, 3rd World, apophatic theology, asimov, comic, Dawkins, deconstruction, Enby, ethics, gender, gender binary, gender fluid, hardship, internet, Isaac Asmiov, Milana Vayntrub, morality, NB, negative theology, perception, philosophy, podcast, political correctness, politically correct, postmodern, postmodernism, postmodernist, suffering, truth, Tumblr, via negationis, Wordlview