And that’s a weird question to ask- especially coming from me.
Yours truly, for any new readers, is a dude. I’ve never worn high heels, and with my long and elegant (if somewhat hairy) legs, I’ve never had cause to.
Like this, only more so.
In spite of my obvious lack of experience, compounded with a whole gamut of cultural-historial-societal variables, I’d still wholeheartedly call myself a feminist. As such, I still feel compelled to ask-
Can a feminist wear high heels?
And I know this isn’t a new issue. For years, folks have generally agreed that high heels are uncomfortable and impractical. There’s not shortage of studies demonstrating the range of health issues they can cause: calf cramps, chronic (and permanent) pain, pelvic issues, callouses and corns, inflammation, pinched nerves, tendinitis, and a host of others which I could spend this entire post just listing.
I’m not going to do that.
According to science and common ****ing sense, no one’s are…
High heels are bad for you. That’s a cold, hard medical fact, and one that most everyone’s familiar with by now. Still, women continue to wear ’em, which again begs the question of “Why in heaven’s name would they put themselves through this?” Continue reading
Posted in advertisement, advertising, bizarreness, business, design, fashion, feminism, history
Tagged 2nd wave, advertising, arguments against, arguments for, cosmo, Cosmopolitan, Culture, damage, feminine, femininity, feminism, Feminist, Foot Binding, footwear, health, heels, high heels, history, issues, Jezebel, make-up, Medical, Men, Necktie, Prada, Stilleto, style, Versace, women
A teaser for the new James Bond film has hit and I am more than a little excited.
It also makes me feel conflicted because so many aspects of the Bond franchise fly in the face of much of what I strongly believe as a feminist. Below, I’ve outlined a few issues I have with the Bond movies, and below that some reasons why I haven’t given up on the franchise altogether. At this point I’m required to warn you about spoilers, although I seriously doubt I will reveal anything you don’t already know about the films.
1) Women are constantly objectified in Bond films
It’s no secret that the James Bond franchise is all about eye-candy, from the cars and gadgets to virtually every women who steps foot on set. Not only are these women present to demonstrate Bond’s power of seduction, they are also present to be viewed by the movie-goer.
And if near naked ladies aren’t enough for you, they will throw in some naked lady silhouettes in the opening credits.
One of the only women to not be sexualized in her role was Judi Dench, who played M in the last seven Bond films. Unfortunately, although not surprisingly, she was killed off in the last film.
Posted in feminism, film, sex
Tagged 007, Anita Sarkeesian, assassin, assault, Barbara Broccoli, Bond films, Bond girl, Casino Royale, character development, characters, chase, Daniel Craig, died, feminine, femininity, feminism, Fiction Diversity, fight, hero, Honey Rider, James Bond, Judi Dench, killed, M, MacEwan, male gaze, masculine, movies, Non Violence, objectification, progressive, Progressive Feminism in Bond Films, Q, rape, representation in movies, Severine, sex, sex object, sex trafficking, sexual encounter, sexual violence, sexualization, shag, Skyfall, sleeps with, Spectre, Spy, tough, Ursula Andress, Violence, women, women in film
…And for those of you concerned, Evan has mandated a cut-off for these posts. As important as they are, and as many interesting questions as they raise, there’s only so many weeks in a row we can dedicate to beating a dead horse.
I feel first that I should clarify some of my points in my original response. When I was first drafting it, I was concerned that Kat (who had written a rather personal piece) might take it the wrong way- I’m glad that she gave me the benefit of the doubt on it. Truth is, my issue isn’t with Kat (who I think would agree with most of what I’m about to argue) but with the wider implications of Deschanel’s statements (though there were a few points I take issue with in Kat’s response- but we’ll get to that).
Deschanel argued that “we can be powerful in our own way, our own feminine way“. My response was “No, you ****ing can’t”.
Not “no, you *****ing can’t be powerful”, not “no, you can’t be feminine” (whatever “feminine” means), but rather “no, you can’t have your ‘own feminine way.'”
Why? Continue reading
Posted in bizarreness, celebrity, fashion, feminism, history, lgbt, morality, science
Tagged biological, burnout, clothing, corset, Deschanel, evolutionary psychology, femininity, feminism, gender, gender binary, gender roles, girl, girly, helping profession, high heels, man, Manly, masculine, masculinity, Medical, nurse, Parthians, pink, princess of power, sex, sexism, sexist, she-ra, stereotype, tradition, warrior-princess, woman, womanly, Zoey Deschanel
Last Wednesday, Kat gave us a post titled “Why I Decided to Stop Being a ‘Tough Girl’ and Just Be Me“, a thought-provoking piece on femininity.
I passionately disagree with it.
Let me break it down here.
In her post, Kat referenced this quote by actress Zoey Deschanel:
This idea- that women were or are pressured to be “men”- isn’t a new one. Plenty of folks have made the same observation and there is absolutely truth to that. In fact, we’ve even managed to turn it into a trope at this point, the “warrior-princess”. Continue reading
Posted in bizarreness, feminism, morality, sex
Tagged 2nd wave, 3rd wave, Anne Bonny, Boadicea, Claire Underwood, Dana Scully, Elizabeth Jennings, fantasy, female, feminine, femininity, feminism, Feminist, fight, Frank Frazetta, Gemma Teller, Hua Mulan, inherent, kevlar, Lana Kane, Laura Roslin, Lysistrata, male, marie curie, matriarchal, matriarchy, Men, patriachal, patriarchy., Peloponnesian war, power, promiscuity, qualities, sci-fi, science fiction, sex, sexuality, stoic, strength, tough, traits, warrior-princess, will, women, Zenobia, Zoey Deschanel