A teaser for the new James Bond film has hit and I am more than a little excited.
It also makes me feel conflicted because so many aspects of the Bond franchise fly in the face of much of what I strongly believe as a feminist. Below, I’ve outlined a few issues I have with the Bond movies, and below that some reasons why I haven’t given up on the franchise altogether. At this point I’m required to warn you about spoilers, although I seriously doubt I will reveal anything you don’t already know about the films.
1) Women are constantly objectified in Bond films
It’s no secret that the James Bond franchise is all about eye-candy, from the cars and gadgets to virtually every women who steps foot on set. Not only are these women present to demonstrate Bond’s power of seduction, they are also present to be viewed by the movie-goer.
And if near naked ladies aren’t enough for you, they will throw in some naked lady silhouettes in the opening credits.
One of the only women to not be sexualized in her role was Judi Dench, who played M in the last seven Bond films. Unfortunately, although not surprisingly, she was killed off in the last film.
Posted in feminism, film, sex
Tagged 007, Anita Sarkeesian, assassin, assault, Barbara Broccoli, Bond films, Bond girl, Casino Royale, character development, characters, chase, Daniel Craig, died, feminine, femininity, feminism, Fiction Diversity, fight, hero, Honey Rider, James Bond, Judi Dench, killed, M, MacEwan, male gaze, masculine, movies, Non Violence, objectification, progressive, Progressive Feminism in Bond Films, Q, rape, representation in movies, Severine, sex, sex object, sex trafficking, sexual encounter, sexual violence, sexualization, shag, Skyfall, sleeps with, Spectre, Spy, tough, Ursula Andress, Violence, women, women in film
While I said I was going to continue my discussion on religion, I feel there’s so much material there that it’s going to be easy for me to get sucked into it all. While plunging into the maelstrom of controversy is on my to-do list, before I get too sidetracked, I want to mark off something I’ve had on the back burner for a while now.
3rd Wave Feminism- and everything that’s wrong with it. Continue reading
Posted in feminism, pornography, sex, Shame Day
Tagged 2nd wave feminism, 3rd wave feminism, andrea dworkin, blackface, brothel, dialectic, Don't Trust the B---- in Apartment 23, empowering, empowerment, exploitation, feminism, Feminist, first world, homelessness, human trafficking, Men, objectification, porn, poverty, prositution, rape, sex, sex positive, sexuality, sexualization, slavery, strip club, stripping, women
Look at that image on the right. Look at it. Falling back on that whole idea that “a picture is worth a thousand words” that should really be all I need to present to make the point that child beauty pageants are really not a good thing.
I like to fall back on facts, though, so I went out of my way to Google the words “how child beauty pageant facts” and clicked on an article helpfully titled “5 reasons child pageants are bad for kids.”
This article had some pretty standard stuff like how these girls are too young to refuse and how they’re clearly being sexualized through these pageants [I’ll be referring to the latter article again later]. What surprised me the most was their fourth reason, which was that hair spray can actually act as a hormone disruptor and stunt growth or cause lung cancer. Continue reading
Posted in bizarreness, Europe, Fame Day, health, sex
Tagged ban, child beauty pageants, children, Fame Day, France, hair spray, harmful, Here Comes Honey Boo Boo, hormone disruptor, negative effects, sexualization
Pink is everywhere, and it’s a problem.
Let me clarify. There is nothing actually wrong with the colour pink. I’m not personally a fan, but I don’t have anything against the colour itself. I have an issue with how it is being used. It’s being used to tell children that certain toys are for girls and certain toys are for boys.
Often it’s as simple as taking the same toy and making one pink and one blue. But more often than not toys are also separated into certain play “scripts.” These scripts teach children that different behavior is appropriate depending on if you are a boy or girl. While little girls are sold kitchen sets, little boys are sold mini tools kits.
Posted in advertising, feminism, media, sex
Tagged advertising, Amanda Todd, blackmale, Brave, CBC documentary, Disney, Dr Gail Dines, explicit photos, feminism, gender, How Cinderella ate my Daughter, kids, Lego, media, Peggy Orenstein, pink, Pornland, Princess, sex, sext up kids, sexualization, society, suicide, toys